Skip to main content

MySQL Scaling in 2024

Listen:

When your MySQL database reaches its performance limits, vertical scaling through hardware upgrades provides a temporary solution. Long-term growth, though, requires a more comprehensive approach. This involves optimizing the database strategically and integrating complementary technologies.

Caching

The implementation of a caching layer, such as Memcached or Redis, can result in a notable reduction in the load and an increase ni performance at MySQL. In-memory stores cache data that is accessed frequently, enabling near-instantaneous responses and freeing the database for other tasks. For applications with heavy read traffic on relatively static data (e.g. product catalogues, user profiles), caching represents a low-effort, high-impact solution.

Consider a online shop product catalogue with thousands of items. With each visit to the website, the application queries the database in order to retrieve product details. By using caching, the retrieved details can be stored in Memcached (as example) for subsequent access. Subsequent requests can be served directly from the cache, resulting in near-instantaneous responses and a reduction in the load on your MySQL server. Here's an example in python:

import memcache

# Connect to Memcached
mc = memcache.Client(['127.0.0.1:11211'], debug=0)

def get_product(product_id):
    # Check cache first
    product_data = mc.get(f'product:{product_id}')
    if product_data:
        return product_data

    # Not in cache, fetch from MySQL
    cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM products WHERE id = %s", (product_id,))
    product_data = cursor.fetchone()

    # Store in cache for future use
    mc.set(f'product:{product_id}', product_data, time=3600)  # Cache for 1 hour

    return product_data

Sharding

When facing massive data volumes or high write throughput, sharding emerges as a powerful scaling strategy. By partitioning your data across multiple MySQL servers, you achieve horizontal scalability, enhanced performance, and improved availability.

Let's say you're running a social networking platform with millions of users. Instead of storing all user data in a single MySQL instance, you could shard the data based on the user's ID. This means users with IDs 1-1000000 might be stored on shard 1, users with IDs 1000001-2000000 on shard 2, and so on. When your application needs to access user data, it determines the appropriate shard based on the user's ID and queries that specific server. 

While MySQL lacks native sharding, several open-source tools and frameworks can simplify its implementation.

Vitess

=> https://vitess.io/

Vitess offers a unique combination of key MySQL features with the scalability of a NoSQL database, providing customers with a highly flexible and scalable solution. The built-in sharding features enable users to expand their databases without having to incorporate sharding logic into their applications.

ProxySQL

=> https://proxysql.com/

ProxySQL is not simply another tool at the disposal of database administrators; it is a transformative solution. By intelligently routing queries, balancing loads and providing failover handling, ProxySQL gives organisations the power to fully utilise their database infrastructure. ProxySQL is a versatile solution that can address a range of challenges, including scalability issues, performance enhancements and high availability. It is suitable for use in diverse database environments.

HAProxy

=> https://www.haproxy.org/

HAProxy is a free, high-performance reverse proxy solution offering unparalleled reliability, load balancing, and proxying for both TCP and HTTP-based applications. It is particularly suited to very high traffic websites and powers a significant portion of the world's most visited ones. Over time, it has become the industry standard for open-source load balancers. It is now included in the majority of mainstream Linux distributions and is frequently deployed as a default option in cloud platforms.

Advantages of Sharding

  • Horizontal Scalability: Add more shards as your data grows, distributing the load and avoiding bottlenecks. 
  • Improved Performance: Each shard handles a smaller subset of data, leading to faster queries and writes. 
  • High Availability: If one shard fails, the rest of the system can continue operating, minimizing downtime.

Disadvantages of Sharding

  • Increased Complexity: Sharding adds complexity to your application and database management.
  • Cross-Shard Queries: Queries that span multiple shards can be challenging and less performant.
  • Data Rebalancing:As your data grows unevenly, you may need to rebalance shards to maintain even distribution.

Additional Optimization Strategies

  • Query Optimization: Analyze and optimize slow queries using tools like EXPLAIN and query profilers.
  • Indexing: Create and maintain efficient indexes to accelerate data retrieval.
  • Replication: Use read replicas to offload read traffic and improve availability.
  • Connection Pooling: Manage database connections efficiently to reduce overhead and enhance concurrency. 
  • Hardware Optimization: Ensure your MySQL server has sufficient CPU, memory, and storage resources. Consider using SSDs for faster disk I/O.

Conclusion

To achieve effective scaling of MySQL, a comprehensive DevOps strategy is required that extends beyond hardware upgrades. By understanding your application's unique needs and leveraging appropriate techniques such as caching, sharding and query optimisation, you can build a resilient, high-performance database infrastructure that supports your organisation's growth and ensures a seamless user experience.

It is important to note that the optimal scaling strategy is dependent on the specific requirements and constraints of the individual organisation. Adopt a proactive approach, continuously monitor performance, and be prepared to evolve your architecture in line with the changing needs of your application.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Deal with corrupted messages in Apache Kafka

Under some strange circumstances, it can happen that a message in a Kafka topic is corrupted. This often happens when using 3rd party frameworks with Kafka. In addition, Kafka < 0.9 does not have a lock on Log.read() at the consumer read level, but does have a lock on Log.write(). This can lead to a rare race condition as described in KAKFA-2477 [1]. A likely log entry looks like this: ERROR Error processing message, stopping consumer: (kafka.tools.ConsoleConsumer$) kafka.message.InvalidMessageException: Message is corrupt (stored crc = xxxxxxxxxx, computed crc = yyyyyyyyyy Kafka-Tools Kafka stores the offset of each consumer in Zookeeper. To read the offsets, Kafka provides handy tools [2]. But you can also use zkCli.sh, at least to display the consumer and the stored offsets. First we need to find the consumer for a topic (> Kafka 0.9): bin/kafka-consumer-groups.sh --zookeeper management01:2181 --describe --group test Prior to Kafka 0.9, the only way to get this inform

Hive query shows ERROR "too many counters"

A hive job face the odd " Too many counters:"  like Ended Job = job_xxxxxx with exception 'org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.counters.LimitExceededException(Too many counters: 201 max=200)' FAILED: Execution Error, return code 1 from org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.MapRedTask Intercepting System.exit(1) These happens when operators are used in queries ( Hive Operators ). Hive creates 4 counters per operator, max upto 1000, plus a few additional counters like file read/write, partitions and tables. Hence the number of counter required is going to be dependent upon the query.  To avoid such exception, configure " mapreduce.job.counters.max " in mapreduce-site.xml to a value above 1000. Hive will fail when he is hitting the 1k counts, but other MR jobs not. A number around 1120 should be a good choice. Using " EXPLAIN EXTENDED " and " grep -ri operators | wc -l " print out the used numbers of operators. Use this value to tweak the MR s

AI's False Reality: Understanding Hallucination

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has leapfrogged to the poster child of technological innovation, on track to transform industries in a scale similar to the Industrial Revolution of the 1800s. But in this case, as cutting-edge technology, AI presents its own unique challenge, exploiting our human behavior of "love to trust", we as humans face a challenge: AI hallucinations. This phenomenon, where AI models generate outputs that are factually incorrect, misleading, or entirely fabricated, raises complex questions about the reliability and trust of AI models and larger systems. The tendency for AI to hallucinate comes from several interrelated factors. Overfitting – a condition where models become overly specialized to their training data – can lead to confident but wildly inaccurate responses when presented with novel scenarios (Guo et al., 2017). Moreover, biases embedded within datasets shape the models' understanding of the world; if these datasets are flawed or unreprese